Saturday 26 September 2015

Cisco Wins Even When It Loses in the SDN Market

Cisco Wins Even When It Loses in the SDN Market

Despite the growing popularity of VMWare's NSX software-defined-networking product, Cisco's hardware is still the overwhelming favorite.

Software-defined networking, which allows network administrators to control a network through software, was viewed as a major threat to Cisco's (NASDAQ:CSCO) business model a few years ago. Cisco is the dominant player in the networking hardware market, and its share of the switching and routing markets dwarfs those of the company's nearest competitors. But cheap, commodity networking hardware coupled with software had the potential to upend Cisco's very profitable operation.

Except for some large web companies that have the resources to design their own switching hardware, SDN has yet to have a negative impact on Cisco's business. Cisco launched its own take on SDN, called Application Centric Infrastructure, or ACI, in 2013, and growth has been swift. During the last reported quarter, ACI grew by more than 200% year over year.

Nexus

Nexus 9000 switch. Source: Cisco.

The major alternative to Cisco's ACI comes from VMWare (NYSE:VMW), a company best known for virtualization products. VMWare is strictly a software company, so it doesn't compete with Cisco's networking hardware, but it does compete with ACI with its own take on SDN called NSX. NSX is compatible with a variety of networking hardware, including hardware from Cisco. NSX is also growing fast, and during VMWare's latest earnings conference call, the company stated it believed the number of NSX production customers was larger than any of its competitors numbers.

Why NSX is not a near-term threat to Cisco
While the growing presence of NSX would suggest that Cisco's hardware empire is at risk, given that NSX supports Cisco's major competitors, that's actually not the case. According to Dominick Delfino, VP of worldwide systems engineering at VMWare, about 75% of NSX clients run the software on top of Cisco hardware.

This speaks volumes about how entrenched Cisco's hardware truly is; Swapping out Cisco's switches for those of a competitor is not a trivial task. Cisco has faced lower-priced competition for years, and it has remained the dominant market leader despite this competition. The proliferation of NSX doesn't really change the competitive dynamics of the industry, at least not in the short term.

I wouldn't expect Cisco to start losing market share, regardless of how fast NSX is growing. In the long term, Cisco would certainly prefer customers to use both its hardware as well as ACI. This would create an even stronger lock-in effect, as the cost to switch to an alternative would be even greater compared to a customers using only Cisco's hardware.

Whether both NSX and ACI can be successful simultaneously remains to be seen. One may become the overwhelming standard, and Cisco would obviously prefer the winner to be ACI. If NSX comes out on top, the likelihood that networking hardware becomes commoditized certainly increases, but Cisco's competitive advantage doesn't disappear. Price is only one factor, and the underlying hardware still needs to be reliable and perform well, regardless of the software running on top.

A great value
There's clearly some pessimism hanging over Cisco's stock, and this has created an opportunity for those who believe the threat of SDN to Cisco's business is overblown. Backing out the net cash on Cisco's balance sheet, which totals about $6.85 per share, the stock trades at just about 10.5 times the trailing-12-month GAAP earnings.

For a company as dominant as Cisco, this valuation doesn't make much sense. Of course, it's not impossible that Cisco falls from grace; once-dominant companies have certainly been destroyed by unforeseen developments in the past. But at the stock's current valuation, there's a significant margin of safety. Cisco doesn't need to post rapid growth for things to work out well for those who buy at these prices, and while predicting the future is hard, particularly when it comes to technology stocks, the risk-reward equation looks favorable for investors.

The next billion-dollar iSecret
The world's biggest tech company forgot to show you something at its recent event, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering their brand-new gadgets and the coming revolution in technology. And we think its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early, in-the-know investors! To be one of them, just click here.


Friday 25 September 2015

Comparison Intel - 1st Generation | 2nd Generation | 3rd Generation | 4th Generation

Intel | i3 | i5 | i7 |

1st Generation

2nd Generation

3rd Generation

4th Generation

Year 2008 - 2010

Year 2005, 2009, 2011

Year 2011 - 2012

Year 2013 - 2015

Nehalem

SandyBridge

Ivy Bridge

Haswell

4–12 MB L3 cache

-

32 KB data + 32 KB instruction L1 cache (4 clocks) and 256 KB L2 cache (11 clocks) per core

-

reduction in L2 cache size

enlarged L3 cache that is shared among all cores.

-

Shared L3 cache includes the processor graphics

-

Hyper-threading reintroduced.

->

->

->

Up to 4 physical cores or 8 logical cores through Hyper-threading.

Up to 8 physical cores or 16 logical cores through Hyper-threading.

2 to 4 Cores

2–4 (mainstream)

6–8 (enthusiast)

2–18 (Xeon)

64 KB L1 cache per core (32 KB L1 data and 32 KB L1 instruction), and 256 KB L2 cache per core.

64-byte cache line size.

64-byte cache line size

64-byte cache line size

45nm from factor

32nm from factor

22 nm from factor

22 nm from factor

10–25% better single-threaded performance

20–100% better multithreaded performance at the same power level

15% faster than first Generation

5%-8% faster than second Generation

10% faster than third Generation

 

Up to 6% faster single-threaded performance.

 

 6% faster multi-threaded performance.

-

-

10%-15% faster than first Generation

20%-25% faster than first Generation

30% lower power consumption for the same performance

consume less power

up to 50% less power consumption at the same performance level as 2-D planar transistors

Desktop variants of Haswell draw between 8% and 23% more power under load than Ivy Bridge

 

battery backup is more

-

battery backup is still more

-

Improvement in Graphics performance

Integration of the GMCH (integrated graphics and memory controller) and processor into a single die inside the processor package.

-

Upto to 20% performance increase in graphics over the 3rd Gen

-

Intel InTru 3D

-

-

-

Clear Video HD and WiDi 2.0

-

-

-

-

-

Native support for dual-channel DDR3 memory, with up to 32 GB

DDR3 Memory

DDR3 Memory

DDR3 Memory

DDR4 Memory Support

Integration of PCI Express and DMI into the processor

 

PCI Express 3.0 support

A total of 16 PCI Express 3.0 lanes on LGA 1150 variants

-

The built-in GPU has 6 or 12 execution units (EUs)

The built-in GPU has 6 or 16 execution units (EUs)

-

-

-

Intel HD Graphics with DirectX 11, OpenGL 3.1

-

-

-

Multiple 4K video playback

-

-

-

Intel Quick Sync Video version 2

-

-

-

25% to 68% increase in integrated GPU performance

-

Second-generation Intel Virtualization Technology, which introduced Extended Page Table support, virtual processor identifiers (VPIDs), and non-maskable interrupt-window exiting

-

-

-

-

A 14- to 19-stage instruction pipeline, depending on the micro-operation cache hit or miss

A 14- to 19-stage instruction pipeline, depending on the micro-operation cache hit or miss

A 14- to 19-stage instruction pipeline, depending on the micro-operation cache hit or miss

-

-

Ivy Bridge-E/EN/EP/EX

Up to 12 CPU cores and 30 MB of L3 cache

Up to 15 CPU cores and 37.5 MB L3 cache

-

-

-

 3D tri-gate transistors

3D tri-gate transistors

-

-

-

Four versions of the integrated GPU: GT1, GT2, GT3

Voltage regulator on motherboard

Voltage regulator on motherboard

Voltage regulator on motherboard

Fully integrated voltage regulator

-

-

-

New advanced power-saving system

-

-

-

37, 47, 57 W thermal design power (TDP) mobile processors

-

-

-

18–20 cores for Xeon server cpu

Xeon E5-2600 v3 & Xeon E5-1600 v3 – 18 Cores

 



--
Thanks,
Sameer Naik
MCSE / MCTS
Pune (India)
Cell : 09730046246